福建宁德：文化科技卫生“三下乡”送去关心关爱、健康与便利******
(新春走基层)福建宁德：文化科技卫生“三下乡”送去关心关爱、健康与便利
中新网宁德1月12日电 (林榕生)“能帮我写一副春联吗？”“能帮我量下血压吗？”“爷爷您头发长了，我帮您剃个头。”……12日，福建省宁德市柘荣县城郊乡靴岭尾村热闹非凡，医疗义诊服务、义务理发、义务题写春联等服务活动有序开展，在欢声笑语中为民众送去关心关爱、健康与便利。
宁德市委常委、宣传部部长李彦致辞。 林榕生 摄当天，由宁德市委宣传部牵头，全市94家主联办单位联合组织的2023年宁德市文化科技卫生“三下乡”集中服务活动在柘荣县城郊乡靴岭尾村举行，为基层发展办好事办实事，把文明新风吹入民众生活，把惠民服务送到民众心坎，进一步推动乡村振兴，加快推进农业农村现代化。
“三下乡”活动组委会捐赠牌交接仪式。 林榕生 摄宁德市委常委、宣传部部长李彦表示，希望通过此次活动，进一步把党的政策方针、文化卫生、科技法律、欢乐精彩送到农民家门口，把宁德市“三下乡”活动打造成为深受基层民众欢迎的民心工程和农村精神文明建设的响亮品牌。
慰问困难群众。 林慧婷 摄活动现场，宁德市委宣传部副部长余桑代表“三下乡”活动组委会宣读了筹集款物清单，本次筹集款物、项目总价值329万元。其间，李彦一行还入户慰问5户困难民众，并调研靴岭尾村乡村振兴和文化建设情况。
柘荣县委书记张晓容致辞。 袁镔 摄柘荣县委书记张晓容表示，科技文化卫生“三下乡”活动是服务基层、服务“三农”的重要载体，将把开展“三下乡”活动与巩固脱贫成果、推进乡村振兴、改善人居环境等“三农”工作有机结合起来，把舞台搭到农村、把科技送到田间、把医疗资源送进家门，更好地推进农村精神文明建设和各项事业发展。
2023年宁德市文化科技卫生“三下乡”集中服务活动现场。 袁镔 摄启动仪式结束后，《闽东药城护健康》《慢城柘荣》《多彩的山海》等文艺演出接连上演，为现场民众带来了一场“文艺大餐”，一幅乡村美丽蝶变的柘荣新画卷展示在观众面前，赢得阵阵掌声。活动现场还贴心赠送已经熬制好的中药，设置中医诊疗咨询服务，并开展防疫科普，将科学健康送到基层民众身边。
义务题写春联。 林榕生 摄靴岭尾村是柘荣县剪纸特色村，也是该县全面推进乡村振兴的靓丽缩影。近年来，该村围绕“清新乡野、文创田园”的村庄发展定位，引导鼓励村民积极参与农村人居环境整治，形成村庄花园化、庭院景观化的美丽风景，成为远近闻名的“中国剪纸第一村”，走出了一条“农旅+文旅”的乡村振兴之路。
义务理发。 林榕生 摄李彦表示，各有关单位要坚持贴近实际、贴近生活、贴近民众的原则，积极探索“三下乡”活动的新内容、新形式、新方法、新机制，把“三下乡”活动做实做好、做出实效，切实营造全社会重视基层、关注民生、服务“三农”的浓厚氛围；要把“三下乡”活动与新时代文明实践、乡村振兴等工作结合起来，不断提高活动的质量和深度，给予民众实实在在的帮助和支持。(完)
医疗义诊服务。 林榕生 摄中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
